Skip to main content


Interview with Victoria Rosenman


I r i n a  R u s i n o v i c h

Interview with Victoria Rosenman

1.Victoria, you have an art education and you planned to devote yourself to painting. What was the key moment to choosing photography as your medium?

There were exactly two key moments that led me to photography:
My familiarity with graphics and painting and unfortunately also my subjective or false perception of artistic value. In the first year of study, I felt very privileged when it came to painting techniques, because I was convinced that my years of experience as a child in a Russian painting school full of discipline and all conventions proved my skill and that I was able to do something better than other people. I demonstrated lifelike illustrations on paper or canvas, but they were without content. This demonstration of the inauthentic, technical ability resulted in my first strong artistic block.
At that time my professor recommended that I write down all my suffering and other emotional states, so that as semester papers and at exhibitions I presented all the texts and formulas that came from within. The reaction of the audience was rather neutral, which made me very outraged and sad. Nobody wanted to read subjective pseudophilosophical texts by an art student. So I decided on stronger visualisation so that outsiders can better engage with my thoughts and concepts. So I started to reproduce the content of what was written in the form of photography: texts became images.

Another reason why I chose  photography and why I also continue the project „From the destruction of a muse“ (the upcoming exhibition „Don’t kill me“ is another component of the project) , are interpersonal relationships that inspire and frighten me, which I ultimately “preserve” as an eternal requiem in various forms of representation.
I started documenting an extraordinary relationship. I wanted to capture the personality of a person because this presence and aura in a good sense nourished and moved me. For me, this person was a muse – a source of inspiration. I later found out that certain characteristics and polarities of a human personality are very appealing to me and I want to „hold onto“ more of the psyche of everyone. Photography was able to clarify my visions and a certain stage of my relationships and trigger further, productive thought processes.

2.Your oevre is inspired by classical photography; light, shapes and color. What do you think is the starting point in your work?

I would not say that they are classic photographic representations. I mostly take pictures outdoors in daylight – I use almost no artificial light sources because I love painterly aesthetics and the transition or mixing of photos to and / or painting is very liberating. I don’t want to commit myself to a specific medium, the photos I take are part of the whole. Texts, installations and, of course, the “muses” are part of the whole. Often at my openings people are exhibited in front of their photographic images, which I call my muses. So I offer the viewer to compare the „living“, „breathing“ reality with my perception. Speaking of comparisons: if we come back to the original question: the classic view of my photos is explained or visible to the extent that, of course, I do not like depth of field or photograph everything sharply and light / shadow plays often achieve painterly effects that are reminiscent of old master paintings.

3.Choosing a Muse is the main part of the process for your works. Tell us about how you choose them?

I watch a lot, but I’m not looking for people who should become my muses. People who work with me on the project, despite their openness, radiate a lot of discrepancy and are not afraid to show their vulnerability. To recognise such a character, of course, I also have to spend some time with this person. The revelation of the inner polarities of a muse is the origin and beginning of my artistic work. The photographic illustration or texts are only final results or memorabilia, a valuable process that documents an interpersonal relationship – a devotion between artist and muse, an interplay of power and dependency, guilt and innocence – a mutual challenge. I also write about this in my manifestos, which I have now published in the form of an art book (the book can be purchased at the opening of „don’t kill me“)
Of course, a discrepancy between the outside and inside of a person is always very exciting and a certain appearance often leads us to get to know the personality of the person better. In the end, mutual trust counts and good friendships have developed from many processes.

4.Your manifesto speaks of a certain “seismographic perception of a person”, please explain what exactly this means and how it is displayed in your works.

My “muses” should be able to show themselves to be as vulnerable as possible. Of course, this requires a lot of preparatory work, a process that I call very valuable. In the process, we build trust, open up, deliver each other. You go through different phases together, which are sometimes attractive, sometimes painful. Later, a clear psychogram of a personality emerges – in the case for me: a photographic image of the „current“ muse. This means that a „seismographic“ approach means a meticulous recording or demonstration of the characteristics of a muse.

5.The starting points in your work are eternal human conflicts; power and dependence, destruction and creation. What exactly do you project in your works? Process or decision

The process is supposed to satisfy me in the first place and when it happens, I automatically trigger new thoughts and thus also offer solutions. Whether these solutions can be applied to other individuals is less important to me. It is enough if questions arise. „Mark“ questions people – I like this idea.

6.Describe what beauty means to you in a nutshell.

I think there are many types of beauty and their intensities increase or decrease in different contexts. For this I reveal my first, self-invented formula, which I presented on a DinA4 sheet of paper in my first year of graduation:
Degradation / effect = value.

And don’t forget to subscribe

Elena Kudryavtseva „Metalpositive“

By /ART/


Photographer: Elena Kudryavtseva @elenakudryavtseva_photography
Fashion stylist / Creative Director: Nastya Svobodnyh @nastya_svobodnyh
HMUA: Vladislava Nikitina @vladislavanikitina
Model: Varia Umnaya @umnayaaa23
Jewelry: Anastasiia Sergacheva @sergacheva_jewelry
Underwear: CALVIN KLEIN @calvinklein

my body will say before me
my scars will scream louder than me
the metal on my body will explain more
expressively than me

Markus Brönner „Lost Freedom“

By /ART/


PHOTOGRAPHER Markus Brönner @markus.broenner
MODEL Sarah Bzoch @sarah.bzoch @stellamodels
MODEL Fabio Blaimberger @fabio_bl_ @mostwantedmodels_official
CONCEPT & STYLING Trang Cao @trangcaostyling @fame_agency_munich
SET STYLING Beatrice Schuell @beatriceschuell
HAIR & MAKEUP Maria Mutz @mutz.maria @fame_agency_munich

Top & Pants: Patrizia Pepe
Heels: Asos

Denim: Timezone
Ruffle dress: Marcel Ostertag; Earcuff: Apher

Coat: Marcel Ostertag; Skirt: Anonyme
Shoes: Geox; Dessous: Calvin Klein; Boots: 8 by Yoox

Jeans: Timezone; Blazer: Patrizia Pepe
Dress: Second female

Dress: Anni Carlson
Shoes: Patrizia Pepe

Coat: Topshop; Boots: Gestuz
Hat: Spatz Hutdesign; Top & Pants: Patrizia Pepe

Dessous: Calvin Klein
Boots: 8 by Yoox

Tatiana Vakhrusheva „Missing the ocean“

By /ART/


PHOTOGRAPHER Tatiana Vakhrusheva @tanyavakh_
MODEL Eugenia Scherbinina @jenny.mdl
MAKEUP ARTIST/HAIR STYLIST Viktoria Istomina @v.i_makeup
WARDROBE STYLIST Nina Atiskova @ninzeee

The story is becoming relevant in the light of the last events and the regime of self-isolation. It is  the story about the girl who is prisoned alone at home and who misses the ocean so bad. But the only thing she has is a toy blue whale that she spends all her time with and that reminds her the ocean a lot.

Body Bershka; Body Vintage
Dress Vintage

Crown Stylist’s property; Ties Calzedonia;
Shoes Bershka; Coat 22.Clothes

Kimono 22.Clothes

Body Bershka
Body Vintage

Kimono 22.Clothes